"A company is only as good as the people it keeps." –Mary Kay Ash
Peeps First: a blog about putting people first
  • Blog
  • About

The road less traveled: how unconventional career choices led me to my dream career

1/17/2019

3 Comments

 
Picture
“Two roads diverged in a wood and I - I took the one less traveled by, and that has made all the difference.” –Robert Frost

Take a moment to reflect on where you are in your career right now, and think about the path you followed to get there. Why have you chosen this particular career path? Have you made deliberate, strategic choices about your career, or have your choices been reactions to external influences? What has motivated your career choices? Money? Expectations of others? Success? What’s your definition of a successful career?

Now think about your future career path. What would you like it to look like? Would it be similar to the path you’ve followed so far, or would it look completely different? Where would you like to be one year from now? Five years? Ten years? Why would you choose that career path? What about those choices are important to you?

I’ve done a lot of reflecting on my own career path, and how it looks so different than what I thought it would look like when I was younger. By the time I was eight years old, I knew I wanted to be an architect when I grew up. My most prized possession was my dad’s old drafting table, and I would spend hours and hours drawing floor plans of “dream” houses that I would daydream about living in when I grew up. I also really loved math and thought engineering would be a good career choice. So I got my degree in Architectural Engineering and began my career as a structural engineer. I envisioned myself rising up in the ranks of my chosen profession, eventually becoming the president of my own structural engineering firm. I had a well-thought-out plan, and all I had to do was follow that plan to be successful.

But you know what they say about the best-laid plans…

Looking back 20+ years later, to say I’ve followed a nonlinear career path would be an understatement. I imagine my career path might resemble a child’s drawing: a line wandering randomly all over the page, in all directions, not following any particular pattern. I’ve worked in four different professions: structural engineering, management consulting, organization development, and people strategy. I’ve worked in three different industries: construction, technology, and healthcare. Twice in my life I’ve quit my job without another job lined up, because I was feeling discontent and wanted to focus on exploring new career options. I have taken pay cuts twice. I have taken a longer time advancing to more senior roles than most people, and I’ve twice made backwards moves to less senior roles, because it was a way to get my foot in the door of a new profession. I have worked in several cities all over the world. And outside of my “day jobs,” I’ve taken on dozens of various side roles, including board member, leadership coach, writer, speaker, mentor, volunteer, tutor, and committee leader, to name some of them.

Why did I deviate so completely from my original career plan? Why have I made so many changes, and pursued so many outside projects, throughout my career? It’s not about getting bored easily or being unhappy with where I’m at. In fact, with only one exception, I haven’t left any of my jobs because I was unhappy. And it’s not about taking extreme risks. While some of my career choices may have looked risky from the outside, to me, they never felt very risky. That’s because the one common thread for me, throughout my professional life, has been following my passion. All of my career choices have been driven by passion. And I have always believed that if I follow my passion, I will succeed.

When I was a young, enthusiastic twentysomething working in structural engineering, I loved the challenge of designing complicated buildings that were both structurally sound and beautiful. While a lot of structural engineers loved to find ways to say no to architects, I loved finding creative ways to say yes: maintain the architectural vision of a building while still meeting structural codes. I became a licensed structural engineer and got very involved in the professional association for structural engineering. I was well on track to have a very successful career.

But after a few years, the engineering started to feel a bit repetitive. Structural designs were mostly slightly different variations of the same problems I’d encountered before. And the plan check process – dealing with building officials whose mission seemed to be finding fault in my designs – became more and more annoying to me. I started getting more interested in the business side of engineering. I would share frequent suggestions with my division manager on how we could improve operational efficiency, and I wanted to get more involved in strategic planning, budgeting and workforce planning. After hearing dozens of my suggestions, he exasperatedly told me, “I really just need you to be an engineer right now.” Well, that wasn’t what I wanted to hear. So, I decided to quit my job and go to business school.

I loved learning about business, and I soon realized I didn’t want to go back to engineering. I decided to go into consulting, where I’d have the opportunity to work on strategic business problems. After graduating from NYU Stern, I went to work for IBM as a management consultant. I loved the variety of consulting, getting to work on new and different projects, with new problems to solve, every few months. I also loved all of the international travel opportunities that working at IBM gave me. I worked in China for almost a year, and I made several work trips to places throughout Asia, Europe, North and South America.

After several years working as a consultant, I had learned that my favorite consulting projects were people projects – or human capital projects as they were commonly called. I began to realize that I wanted to shift my focus to human resources (HR). I started to explore HR career options in my spare time. But then I got assigned to a consulting project with particularly long hours and a particularly mean client, and I decided to speed up my career change. I quit my job and spent the next several months taking HR classes online, writing, speaking and networking. I started a blog, PeepsFirst.com, about putting people (employees) first. After a few months, one of my former managers from IBM reached out to me and convinced me to come back to IBM, in an organization development role.

So now I was in my 3rd profession, organization development, and I loved it. Although it paid less than consulting, the hours were more reasonable, and the work was incredibly fulfilling. I was essentially getting paid to recruit and hire talented people, and to figure out how to make work better for the employees in my organization. In addition to running some of the existing people programs, I also had the autonomy to propose and develop new people programs. One of the programs I started was a manager development program, to provide support and coaching to new IBM managers. I loved my job and planned to be there for a long time.

But once again, best-laid plans...

My job was in New York City, and I was living in Chicago. I’d alternate between working remotely from Chicago and traveling to New York a couple times a month to work in person with my team. I didn’t have kids, and I loved both cities, so this arrangement suited me perfectly. But after a few years in the job, IBM announced that employees were required to co-locate to where their teams were; no more remote work. So that meant I needed to move back to New York if I wanted to keep my job.

I love New York, and even a year prior it would have been a no-brainer to move back there. But I had recently become engaged to a wonderful man who lived and worked in Chicago. We both loved living in Chicago and didn’t want to leave. I decided I’d look for jobs in Chicago, and if I found the right job, I’d stay.

A few weeks into my job search, at a dinner, I ended up sitting next to an executive who worked at the University of Chicago. I asked him about working for UChicago, and he had very positive things to say about it, so I explored their career site and found a job posting for the Director of People Strategy at UChicago Medicine. People Strategy felt like the perfect fit for me – it would leverage my experience as a strategy and change consultant, and my experience as an HR/organization development professional. Plus, healthcare is an industry that has always excited me. Most people working in healthcare are there because they want to make a difference and help people. It’s an industry where you have all kinds of opportunities to make a positive impact on people. HR + strategy + making a positive impact? Yes, please! UChicago Medicine definitely felt like the right move for my career. I happily accepted the job offer and made the move into healthcare.

One year later, my job at UChicago Medicine has exceeded my already high expectations. I love learning about healthcare, especially being at a place that’s “at the forefront of medicine.” I love coming into work every day and connecting face-to-face with people. I love working with super smart, kind and compassionate colleagues. I love working with our leadership team to solve really interesting people strategy problems. I love that I get paid to focus on things like improving employee engagement. I love that I have more autonomy and influence than I’ve ever had in a job. A few months ago, I led an effort to help strengthen UChicago Medicine’s culture by celebrating our values: Participation, Respect, Integrity, Diversity, and Excellence. I led a team of passionate and dedicated volunteers to plan and implement UChicago Medicine’s first-ever PRIDE Values Week. The employees loved PRIDE Values Week, and it made me so happy to be able to make such a positive impact on people (and get paid for doing it!).

Turns out, this isn’t just the right job – it’s the best job I’ve ever had. One year on, I feel like I’ve already accomplished a lot – and yet I’m just getting started.

So that’s been my convoluted career journey thus far. Have I been successful? Well, that depends on your definition of success. I don’t make as much money as I perhaps could have, had I stayed on a linear career path. I’m in a less senior role as many people my age or younger. I’m also not very well recognized as an expert in my field, because I haven’t been in my current field for very long. But I am one of the happiest people I know. I’m in an industry I love, working for an organization I love, with wonderful people, where I have the opportunity every day to make a positive impact. I also have an incredibly fulfilling personal life: I have a wonderful, supportive partner, and we have a nine-month-old son, who is the most amazing human I’ve ever known. And while work-life balance can sometimes be a challenge, on most days I’m managing to do it pretty well. I would describe my definition of success as “living my most extraordinary life.” So according to my definition of success, yes, I’ve been extremely successful. And I plan to continue living my most extraordinary life for years and years to come.

I would love to hear more about your career path: how you got to where you are now…what has motivated your choices…where you’d like to go in the future. Please comment and share your career story!
3 Comments

All Onboard! How to get new employee onboarding right

7/30/2017

4 Comments

 
Picture
“Onboarding starts with satisfying the most basic of Maslow's psychological needs: belonging.” –Jay Samit

Imagine starting your first full-time job out of college: you’re nervous, excited and scared. You want to do well and make a good impression. On your first day, you put on the confidence-boosting new outfit you’ve bought for the occasion. You smile as you walk up to your new office building, wanting to project self-confidence, despite feeling extremely nervous, and perhaps like somewhat of an impostor: what if they find out you’re not the confident superstar you pretended to be during your job interview? Your heart is racing; your palms are sweating. Today is the start of a new chapter in your life. You have high expectations; you want to make a difference…you want to change the world.
 
You check in with security; but they don’t have your name on the list. They ask you to stand to the side and wait while they sort it out. You’re panicking that you might not get into the building. After what feels like an eternity, they tell you they’ve fixed the problem; you can take the elevator up to your new office. You get in a crowded elevator of people saying hello to each other; you’re feeling completely out of place. You walk into your new office space, give your name to the receptionist, and you’re ushered into a large conference room with lots of people, all of whom you’re sure must be feeling a lot more confident than you are right now. You find your nametag at the check-in desk, grab a cup of coffee and find a seat. You force yourself to say hello to the people sitting next to you and make small talk.
 
Then the instructor starts talking: “Welcome to Acme Corporation! Today we’ll walk through the information you need to know to get started in your new job.” For the next several hours, you listen to PowerPoint presentation after PowerPoint presentation, feeling increasingly overwhelmed with each subsequent presentation, and hoping you’re not going to be expected to remember all this information. You meet a lot of people during the day, and you can’t even begin to remember everyone’s names. The instructor occasionally asks if anyone has any questions, but you’re too confused to even know what to ask. By the end of the day, you’re feeling completely mentally exhausted, and even more overwhelmed than you did that morning. You hope the next day will be better.
 
When you arrive on day 2, the receptionist directs you to your new desk, and tells you your new manager will meet with you later that morning. You sit at your desk with your new laptop, wondering what to do. You’ve already read through the three emails in your new inbox. You’re feeling panicked, wanting to look busy but completely unsure what to do. You decide to reread the handouts from yesterday. You read about Acme’s culture and strategy, employee guidelines, and the description of your new job role…which is just as hard to understand after reading it the fifth time. You read some of the content from Acme’s website: their mission statement, their leadership team, their products and services.
 
Finally, your new manager stops by to say hello, apologizing that she couldn’t meet with you sooner. She invites you to come into her office. You smile nervously as you walk down the hall together, trying to make the appropriate response as she makes small talk. You take a seat in her office, and she spends the next 30 minutes or so giving you information on what she would like you to work on. You’re furiously taking notes as she talks. When she asks if you have questions, you manage to think of one or two. Then she smiles and asks you to let her know if you have other questions.
 
You spend most of the rest of the day feeling completely inadequate. You start working on the first assignment your manager gave you, but the further into it you get, the more questions you have. Should you knock on your manager’s door? Should you send her an email? How often is it appropriate for you to bother her? You decide to keep going on the assignment as best you can, making a list of questions to ask your manager later, and hoping and praying that you’re doing it right. By the end of day two, you’re feeling even more overwhelmed and exhausted than the day before. You’re also feeling scared and a bit demoralized: how are you even going to do a good job, let alone change the world, when everything is so confusing?
 
Of course, employee onboarding experiences take all shapes and forms, and not all of them are as bad as this hypothetical scenario. But, this scenario is unfortunately not that uncommon either. Companies put together well-intentioned onboarding programs, packing as much information as they can into a one- or two-day onboarding program, to give employees the information they need to learn about their new company and their new job role. They will likely give new employees some form of onboarding handbook, and they will either have an instructor go through the onboarding material with a group of several new employees (typical for larger companies), or they may have the new employee’s manager (or someone else) go through the material with the employee (more typical for smaller companies). Or worse…some companies just give the onboarding information to new employees for them to go through themselves. Or worst yet…some companies have little or no onboarding information even documented, and it’s up to the new employees to figure it out for themselves. Why do so many companies under-deliver on onboarding?
 
Quite often, the people creating the employee onboarding experience are seasoned employees with several years of experience in the company, and they forget how scary it can be to start a new job, particularly when it’s your first job out of college. Many companies also underestimate the importance of onboarding in shaping the employee experience. They assume that employees will adjust to their new job over time, and that initially feeling overwhelmed is just part of the new employee learning curve.
 
And while some degree of overwhelm and confusion is unavoidable, a good onboarding program can go a long way to minimize those feelings for new employees, and give new employees a much more positive experience. A good onboarding program provides several benefits: a shorter ramp-up time for new employees to be fully productive in their new role, higher employee engagement, improved employee performance, and lower employee attrition within the first year. In fact, research shows that the benefits of onboarding are so significant, it’s hard to understand why more companies don’t invest in more robust onboarding programs.
 
How can companies deliver a better onboarding experience for new employees? While the optimal onboarding program design will vary by company, here are five things all companies should do (if they don’t already) to ensure a great onboarding experience:

  1. Begin onboarding well before an employee’s first day, and continue onboarding beyond the initial orientation.
  2. Have a group of new employees start on the same day and go through onboarding together.
  3. Make the orientation program long enough to get new employees acclimated to the company culture and cover the most important information.
  4. Include participation from important stakeholders: managers, organization leaders, team members and recent hires.
  5. Gather feedback from new employees at several points in the onboarding process and use it to continuously improve the onboarding experience.
 
1. Begin onboarding well before an employee’s first day, and continue onboarding beyond the initial orientation. Onboarding should begin as soon as a new employee accepts the offer. The time between offer acceptance and start date could range anywhere from several days to, in the case of university students, the better part of a year. When new employees accept their offer, send them a congratulatory email from the company, preferably from their future manager and/or someone who will be the main point of contact throughout onboarding. Let them know how excited you are that they will be joining the company, and invite them to reach out to you if they have questions. It’s important for new employees to feel like they have someone they can go to with questions or concerns.

In my organization, we also assign a buddy to new employees after they accept their offer. We encourage buddies to offer to meet with the new employee in person or by phone prior to their start date, to help answer questions and share their own experience starting at the company. Once new employees start, buddies often take the them out for lunch or coffee, and periodically check in to see how things are going in their first days, weeks and months at the company. Most new employees like having someone besides their manager to go to with questions, and they like being able to build a relationship with someone before they start.
 
Preboarding activities can go a long way in improving the employee experience for new employees, especially when there are several months between offer acceptance and start date. Preboarding activities could include inviting new employees to a social event prior to their start date, to give them a chance to get to know several of their future coworkers in an informal setting. Or preboarding could be as simple as periodic email communications, to share helpful information and remind new employees you’re excited they will soon be joining the company. Even this can go a long way in keeping new employees’ excitement levels high and reassuring them that their future employer hasn’t forgotten about them. In addition to sending periodic emails, we setup a Slack channel where we can share information, moderate discussions and encourage new employees to ask questions.
 
Similarly, onboarding shouldn’t end after the initial orientation. During their first several months on the job, new employees are still getting acclimated to the company and learning the skills and knowledge they need to perform well. While most training beyond orientation will happen on the job, it can still be very helpful to bring new employees back together for regular training and social events. For example, you could plan monthly lunchtime training sessions and/or evening social events for new employees during their first six months. Continued onboarding activities help new employees get up to speed more quickly and improve their employee experience.
 
2. Have a group of new employees start on the same day and go through onboarding together. While it may not be feasible in all situations, particularly in smaller companies, being part of an onboarding “class” is another great way to improve the new employee experience. An employee’s first day can be stressful, and knowing they’re part of a group of people starting on the same day helps to ease the stress level of our new employees. Plus, new employees get a jump on building their network within the company by getting to know the other people in their onboarding class. Most of our new employees say that they remain close with their onboarding classmates after onboarding, and they find it incredibly helpful to have this network of peers within the company.
 
3. Make the orientation program long enough to get new employees acclimated to the company culture and cover the most important information. I use the term “orientation” to refer to the structured part of the onboarding program that begins on an employee’s first day and ends right before employees begin working in their new job role. During orientation, new employees go through training and other activities in a classroom setting. Most orientation programs are one or two days at best. And that’s understandable; it’s a significant investment to implement longer orientation programs. It requires more planning and resources to run the program, and every additional day new employees spend in orientation is a day not spent doing the job they were hired to do. But most companies who make the investment in longer orientation programs report that the benefits far outweigh the costs. Longer orientations help new hires get up to speed in their new job roles more quickly, and they improve engagement levels of new hires, which reduces attrition rates within the first year.
 
How long should an orientation program be? That will vary by company and type of job role, but many companies find that one to two weeks is the right length. The best way to figure out the right length of the program is to agree on what topics should be covered during orientation and map out a sample agenda. My organization has a two-week orientation for new employees, during which we cover the following topics:

  • Administrative onboarding (e.g. laptop setup, paperwork, benefits)
  • Overview of the company, our organization structure, what we sell, our culture, etc.
  • Training workshops on some of the most important topics for our employees to know (in our case this includes topics such as Agile, Design Thinking and how to use common apps and programs)
  • Discussions with several of our leaders and managers: what they do, what their teams/organizations do, advice for new employees
  • Panel discussions with current employees (usually recent hires): what they do, what it’s like to work here, advice for new employees
  • Team projects: new employees work in teams on a consulting-style project and give a final project presentation at the end of orientation. We find this is a great approach to train new employees on teamwork, problem solving and communication skills
  • Team-specific orientation: new employees get to know their new teams and learn more about their specific job roles
  • Social and networking activities, which give new employees a chance to meet and get to know current employees
 
It’s impossible to cover everything new employees need to know during orientation, and if you try to pack in too much detailed information, they will suffer from information overload and retain very little of the information covered. The orientation should focus only on the most important information for new employees, and it should include as many interactive discussions and activities as possible, while minimizing time spent on passive presentations. More detailed information can be organized and documented so that new employees can access information later, when they need it.
 
4. Include participation from important stakeholders: managers, organization leaders, team members and recent hires. The more you can involve participation from important stakeholders, the more likely you will be to have a successful onboarding program.

  • Managers can send a welcome email to their new employees before they start, and arrange to meet one-on-one with their new employees during orientation or immediately after. Managers can also lead a team-specific orientation for their new employees, to introduce them to their team members and teach them about their new job role.
  • Organization leaders should be part of the orientation agenda. They can give a welcome address to new employees on their first day, or they can lead a discussion with new employees to talk about what they do, what their teams/organizations do, and any advice they have for new employees.
  • Team members can participate in the team-specific orientation to talk with new employees about what the team does and how they will work together. They can also attend social events to welcome the new employees and get to know them.
  • Recent hires can be a great resource for helping answer new employees’ questions and sharing their own recent experience of starting with the company. In addition to assigning a recent hire as a buddy for each new employee, you can invite recent hires to social events, and arrange a panel discussion with recent hires to answer questions and share advice with new employees.
 
5. Gather feedback from new employees at several points in the onboarding process and use it to continuously improve the onboarding experience. Feedback can be gathered in a number of ways; some of the most popular methods are surveys, focus groups and individual interviews. I recommend a combination of approaches. Surveys have the advantage of being anonymous (if you set them up that way), which may encourage new employees to be more candid with their feedback, particularly feedback on the parts of the onboarding program they didn’t like. Survey tools also make it easy to aggregate feedback from a large number of people, and it’s easy to report on quantitative onboarding metrics by using surveys. Focus groups and individual interviews are good for gathering more qualitative feedback, at a level of detail that is hard to get through surveys. Focus groups work particularly well for generating ideas about what could be improved, because the focus group participants can build off others’ ideas. I find this often leads to the most (and most creative) ideas for how to improve the onboarding program. Individual interviews are the most time consuming, but they can yield the most detailed and comprehensive set of feedback. The interviews can be short; I generally keep them to 15 minutes each and I cover six or seven questions. It’s helpful if the person doing the interviews already has a good rapport with the new employees, so that they feel comfortable sharing candid feedback. Of course, I always let them know that individual responses will be kept confidential, and only aggregate results will be shared.
 
I recommend gathering feedback at least three times during onboarding: at the end of the initial orientation, then at one month and six months into the job. Each of these time periods yields different feedback, all of which is helpful for different reasons. For example, right after the initial orientation, new employees will have the best feedback on how to improve the preboarding experience and orientation. One month into the job, new employees can share feedback on how their first month has gone and any challenges they are struggling with, which can also allow you to step in and help address significant issues if needed. At six months into the job, employees are in a better position to share feedback on how the ramp-up into their new role has gone and what changes they would suggest to the onboarding program with the benefit of hindsight. I also recommend collecting feedback from the new employees’ managers at this point, to get their feedback on how the new employees are performing, and whether they see any performance issues with their new employees that future onboarding programs might be able to help address.
 
Wrapping it up: what are your suggestions for getting onboarding right?
I’d love to hear from you! Does your company do any of these things as part of onboarding? What other suggestions do you have for getting onboarding right? What do you think are the most important things to include in an onboarding program?

4 Comments

Following my passion for putting people first...and coming back to Big Blue

8/13/2015

2 Comments

 
Picture
"Don't ask yourself what the world needs; ask yourself what makes you come alive. And then go and do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." –Howard Thurman

When I wrote my first blog post for peepsfirst.com back in March, The Life-changing Magic of Mentoring, I had recently left my job as a management consultant at IBM because I wanted to follow my passion for putting people first. I wrote about how my mentor and leadership coach Christina helped encourage me to take a bold leap and follow my passion. Even though I was taking a risk by walking away from a good job with a steady paycheck, I knew that following my passion was the right thing to do.

I knew that I wanted to focus my energy on helping organizations thrive by putting people first. I wanted to help hire, retain, engage and develop great people. I wanted to help employees feel happier and more engaged with their work, which would in turn help their organization become more successful. I wanted to help drive a people-first culture, where leaders recognize the monumental importance of effective talent management and are strongly committed to putting people first.

But what I didn’t know was where my journey would take me. I considered talent consulting, where I could advise multiple companies on their talent management strategy and approach. I considered joining a startup, where I could do something more entrepreneurial and help a company manage its talent effectively while growing very fast. And I considered taking on a talent role in a larger company (a function that many companies call organization development), where I would have the opportunity to positively impact a lot of people.

After dozens of fascinating conversations with people in all kinds of talent roles, several job interviews and countless hours of researching, writing and soul-searching…I decided to go back to a company that was already very familiar to me…IBM! I decided to join the Organization Development team for IBM’s Performance Marketing organization.

I chose to come back to IBM because:
  1. There are a lot of smart, talented, extraordinary IBMers, and I want to work with great people.
  2. IBM is going through a mind-boggling amount of change to stay competitive in the technology industry, and I see a lot of signs that IBM’s leaders recognize the importance of talent and are moving towards more of a people-first culture.
  3. IBM still has a long way to go, and I see exciting opportunities everywhere to help IBM raise the bar on talent and continue to drive more focus on putting people first.

I have big, hairy, audacious goals for putting people first at IBM (I hate the term BHAG, but I couldn’t think of a better one). I’ll share two of those goals, since sharing them will make me even more committed to trying to achieve them.
  1. Help IBM strengthen its employment brand and move waaayyyy up on LinkedIn’s list of The World’s 100 Most InDemand Employers. In 2014, IBM barely made the list, coming in at #100. Within 5 years, I want to see IBM rank within the top 10.
  2. IBM didn’t even make the lists of Best Places to Work by Fortune and Glassdoor. I not only want to help get IBM onto these lists, I want to see IBM break into the top 20 within 5 years.

Yes, I know, these sound like out-of-my-mind-crazy ambitious goals, and there’s a very good chance that I won’t achieve them, given that I’m only one person. But I’m trying to embrace Google’s (#1 on LinkedIn’s, Fortune’s and Glassdoor’s lists, BTW) moonshot thinking, because even if I shoot for the moon and fall short, I might just achieve something remarkable in the process. And, in the words of Steve Jobs (one of the world’s greatest moonshot thinkers), “The people who are crazy enough to think they can change the world are the ones who do.”

Are you an IBMer (or would like to be an IBMer) who shares my vision for raising the bar on talent and putting people first? If you are, I’d love to hear from you! By sharing our visionary ideas and maybe even collaborating together on some of our goals, who knows what kinds of crazy, world-changing things we can achieve?

Photo credit: Wikimedia Commons
2 Comments

How leaders can build a culture of trust…and why they should

6/16/2015

1 Comment

 
Picture
 “Google operates on the belief that people are fundamentally good.” –Laszlo Bock

I’ve been blogging recently about the evolution of talent management: where it has come from and where it needs to go. There are a number of important changes that define how talent management is evolving, but probably the most important change we are seeing is that organizations are getting better at trusting and empowering their employees to do the right thing. There’s still a long way for many organizations to go, but it’s extremely heartening to see some shining examples of companies that trust their employees and the monumentally positive impact that this has on employee engagement.

Google is one of these shining examples of a company that trusts and empowers its employees. In his book Work Rules!, Laszlo Bock, Google’s SVP of People of Operations, explains that “Google operates on the belief that people are fundamentally good,” and the leaders at Google trust and empower their employees to do the right thing. This sounds so simple, yet many companies seem to operate on the belief that people cannot be trusted to do the right thing, and all sorts of controls are needed to prevent bad behavior. When companies like Google have shown the clear benefits of trusting and empowering employees, why is it still so hard for most companies to do?

The benefits of trust and empowerment in the workplace

There is substantial research linking trust with improved employee engagement and organizational performance. One such study, Trust that Binds: The Impact of Collective Felt Trust on Organizational Performance, showed that employees who felt that their managers trusted them demonstrated better sales and customer service performance.

Similarly, it has been repeatedly shown that empowering employees – giving them the freedom to make decisions and get things done – has all kinds of benefits. Empowered employees are more productive, because they can quickly make decisions themselves instead of spending lots of time seeking approval from others. Empowered employees are more innovative, because they have the freedom to think outside of the box and come up with better ways to do things. And of course, empowered employees are happier: who doesn’t prefer having freedom in their work vs. being micromanaged?

But if the benefits of trusting and empowering your employees are so clear and obvious, why are there still so many organizations where it’s lacking?

Why is there such a lack of trust?

There are countless examples of organizations not trusting their employees. Company leaders not allowing employees to work from home because they don’t think employees will work hard when they can’t be physically seen (even though research shows the opposite). Company policies requiring manager approval for even the smallest business expenses. Managers asking employees for detailed daily progress updates so they can micromanage how employees spend their time. Small business owners not going on vacation because they don’t trust their employees to mind the store while they’re away. And so on, and so on.

Why does lack of trust seem to be the default for so many company leaders? Unfortunately, it seems to be human nature for many people to be distrustful, even when the facts are telling them it’s to their benefit to trust people. That irrational, emotional part of people makes it difficult to trust. Trusting people requires a certain degree of vulnerability, and this is difficult for a lot of people. After all, if I trust you to do the right thing, and you take advantage of that trust by harming me financially or otherwise, my natural reaction might be to stop trusting anyone, for fear of being hurt again. So, because of a few incidents of employees behaving badly, the result is often that no employees are trusted.

And because trust is a necessary prerequisite for empowerment, leaders who don’t trust their employees will give them as little empowerment as possible. They will resort to lots of rules, required approvals, excessive tracking and monitoring, etc. Employees, in turn, knowing their leaders don’t trust them, will likely feel resentful of that mistrust, unhappy at work, less productive, and more likely to behave in a way that is not in the best interests of the company (e.g. taking extra sick days). And so the lack of trust becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.

What can companies do to break out of this vicious spiral of distrust?

How leaders can build a culture of trust

Companies with a lack of trust need to focus on changing the culture…from a culture of distrust to a culture of trust. Culture change is hard…it will take time…and it absolutely needs to come from the top. If a company wants to successfully build a culture of trust, company leaders must work on setting aside their predisposition to distrust people and demonstrating that they trust people through their words and actions. No easy task, to be sure. But luckily, companies like Google, Zappos, Southwest and 3M have successfully built a culture of trust, and others can learn from their examples.

Give people the benefit of the doubt. As Laszlo Bock puts it, “If you believe human beings are fundamentally good, act like it.” While many companies seem to operate under a “guilty until proven innocent” premise that trust must be earned, companies with a culture of trust take the opposite approach. They assume people are good and can be trusted, and they act accordingly. A culture of trust has to start with the leaders taking the view that people are fundamentally good, and demonstrating this mindset every day through their words and actions.

Occasionally, even good people do bad things, and when that happens, company leaders must address the bad behavior and let the employee know it won’t be tolerated. If the bad behavior continues or if it’s serious enough, the employee may need to be fired. You can’t maintain a culture of trust if people see that bad behavior is allowed to go unchecked.

Hire great people. It will be much easier for a company’s leaders to trust their employees when they have great employees. Of course, talent acquisition is an extensive and complicated topic of its own, but it bears mentioning because hiring great people is a fundamental part of having a culture of trust. The key is to hire people who not only have outstanding skills and experience, but most importantly, people who fit your culture. If your goal is to have a culture of trust, where leaders and employees act in a trusting manner, then it’s important to hire people who are naturally trusting of others.

Similarly, if you have existing employees who are inherently untrusting, and it’s clear they don’t fit well in a culture of trust, then the best course of action may be to let those people go. Keeping untrusting people employed will undermine even the best efforts to build a culture of trust.

Zappos is a company that is well known for its culture of trust, and that starts with hiring great people. Zappos has a unique hiring process that is very heavily focused on cultural fit. What makes it unique? Instead of responding to a job post (there are no job posts), candidates create an online profile and are encouraged to include a video cover letter to “show your true colors.” Then during the interviews, candidates are not only interviewed about their skills and experience, but they are asked several questions to determine whether they fit with Zappos’ core values. Zappos is known for asking off-the-wall interview questions to assess cultural fit, such as “If you could be a super hero, what would you be and why?”

Be transparent. A key part of trusting employees is sharing information with them. A company can demonstrate trust in its employees by sharing sensitive company information with them and keeping them in the loop on important company decisions. Of course, some information can’t be widely shared for legal, ethical or other reasons, but company leaders should continually challenge themselves to share as much information with employees as possible.

Google, for example, shares the results of their employee surveys with all employees. And they don’t just share a high level summary; they allow employees to filter on any view of the employee survey data they want. Google employees – or Googlers, as they are called – not only get a clear view of the employee survey results, but they clearly see how the company leaders are acting on those results. Contrast this with many other companies, where the norm is to guard employee survey data like Fort Knox, and employees rarely if ever see any post-survey communications telling them how their input is being used to drive change. It’s clear to see that by being as transparent as possible and letting employees know they have a real voice in the company, Google is building a whole lot of trust.

Empower your employees to do the right thing…then get out of the way. One of the clearest and best ways to demonstrate trust in your employees is to empower them…give them the freedom to work how/when/where they want, freedom to make important decisions, freedom to try new ideas, even freedom to make mistakes. As long as employees demonstrate strong performance and deliver outstanding results, it shouldn’t matter if they leave early every Monday for a yoga class. It shouldn’t matter if they choose to allocate some of their time to working on a side project. It shouldn’t matter if they want to work remotely. What’s critically important is that employees understand they are accountable for results. As long as they deliver those results, it’s up to them how they want to manage their work.

Southwest Airlines is a great example of a company that empowers its employees to do the right thing for the customer. It’s not just about flight attendants singing and telling jokes during flights. Pilots, flight attendants, gate agents, telephone service representatives...all employees have the authority to make decisions about how to best serve the customer. Endless examples of empowered employees abound, such as the time a flight attendant gave a passenger a bottle of champagne and let him use the intercom so he could propose to his girlfriend during the flight.

3M empowers its employees through its 15 Percent Time Program, where employees are allowed to spend up to 15% of their working time on their own projects. 3M also encourages its employees to take risks by allowing them to make mistakes. In the words of former 3M President William McKnight, “Management that is destructively critical when mistakes are made kills initiative. And it’s essential that we have many people with initiative if we are to continue to grow.” Empowering employees to take risks by allowing them to fail is one of the fundamental drivers of innovation. It’s no coincidence that risk-averse companies that punish employees for failure are generally some of the least innovative companies.

So many companies expend enormous amounts of effort to control employees and limit their freedoms, supposedly in an effort to suppress bad behavior. Back in the days of the Industrial Revolution, where most people worked on a manufacturing line, control-heavy micromanagement may have served companies well. But those days are gone, and in today’s innovation- and service-driven economy, a culture of distrust is extremely harmful. Not only can controls backfire by incenting employees to behave badly in some cases, but implementing organizational controls is very costly. There are the financial costs of the labor and technology for extensive tracking and monitoring. There are the lost productivity costs of reviews and approvals. And worst of all, there are the decreased employee engagement costs of working in a culture of distrust. If only companies would take steps to replace many of these controls with a culture of trust, work would be simpler, faster, less expensive, more meaningful and more fun!

Photo credit: Pixabay
1 Comment

Integrating talent management across the organization

6/8/2015

3 Comments

 
Picture
“Talent is the No. 1 priority for a CEO. You think it's about vision and strategy, but you have to get the right people first.” –Andrea Jung

In my last article, the evolution of talent management: where it has come from and where it needs to go, I talked about several ways in which talent management is changing and evolving. One of the most critical aspects of this evolution is that talent management is becoming more integrated.

What does it mean for an organization to have integrated talent management? There are multiple ways to define integration, but in my point of view, an organization with truly integrated talent management has these three characteristics:
  1. Talent management is not the exclusive domain of HR but involves the CEO and leaders from across the organization.
  2. The CHRO has the business acumen to be a strategic partner and is held accountable for driving results
  3. Talent strategy is well aligned with business strategy, and talent management programs support strategic priorities and deliver business value.

1. Ensure that talent management is the shared responsibility of leaders across the organization

The most important aspect of integrated talent management is that it cannot be the exclusive domain of HR. Yes, HR should be involved in strategic decision-making, and yes, HR leaders should drive and facilitate many of the talent-related conversations with other business leaders. But for talent management to be successful, it needs to be treated as the shared responsibility of leaders across the organization.

Talent is critical to every single part of the organization – for more and more companies, their people are their biggest competitive differentiator – often the delta between success and failure. So it’s baffling that for so long, in so many organizations, talent management was treated as an HR-only responsibility. Most companies these days are getting the message that talent management is a critical issue that affects the entire organization, as evidenced by recent studies showing that talent is now the number one concern of CEOs.

It goes without saying that the CHRO should be accountable for leading the talent management charge: facilitating discussions with other leaders to define the talent strategy, executing talent management processes and programs, and reaching out to involve executives and managers from across the business in talent management activities as appropriate. But a CHRO doesn’t have formal authority over these executives and managers; the CHRO can only influence them. To really ensure active participation in talent management across the organization, the message needs to come loudly and clearly from the CEO. The CEO needs to communicate that successful talent management is everyone’s responsibility, and all departments will be held accountable for the success of their people. According to the McKinsey book The War for Talent, establishing a talent mindset across the organization is the single most important factor in winning the war for talent, and it absolutely must be driven by the CEO.

2. Ensure that the CHRO has the business acumen and accountability to be a strategic partner

One of the primary root causes of siloed, non-strategic talent management is that HR has not acted as a strategic partner with other business leaders. As described in the 2005 Fast Company article, Why We Hate HR, not only does HR not have a seat at the table, but “the table is locked inside a conference room to which they have no key.” Unfortunately, not a lot has changed in the last decade in terms of HR’s lack of C-level strategic participation. Why is HR so rarely included as a strategic business partner?

Well, to be blunt, many HR leaders have not acted very strategically. HR got a reputation for being focused on policy enforcement, administration and risk minimization, because that’s how many HR professionals behaved. Unfortunately, the “human” part of HR often got lost.

HR expertise alone does not make a great HR leader. HR leaders need to be able to think strategically, and they need to have a deep understanding of the business and its strategic priorities. They need to be able to speak the language of the other business leaders in the organization, and they need to be very good at exerting influence. They need to be analytic thinkers, problem solvers, and change leaders. Not surprisingly, some of the best HR leaders have held leadership roles in other parts of the business as well as in HR.

One notable example of a successful CHRO is Tim Huval, CHRO at Humana. Prior to Humana, Huval held a number of leadership roles at Bank of America, both in HR and in other parts of the organization. He was the first C-level hire made by the incoming CEO Bruce Broussard, and in the time he’s been there, Huval has been leading a major people and culture transformation as Humana shifts its business model from a traditional insurance company to a technology company that focuses on improving its members’ well-being. Throughout the transformation, employee turnover has remained low and employee engagement scores have remained high. According to a recent Forbes article ranking Huval #1 on its list of top CHROs, “Huval refuses to take credit for any of the many successes Humana has achieved over the last two years, quickly giving the credit to his colleagues and teammates. But those who know him will quickly point to the critical nature of his role in Humana’s transformation into the enterprise Broussard envisioned.”

Another key issue is that HR leaders have rarely been held accountable for delivering results. Because the business impact of HR programs can be difficult to measure, and because HR has indirect influence rather that direct responsibility for many aspects of talent management, they are rarely held accountable for delivering business value. In other words, many HR leaders have no skin in the game.

This needs to change. HR needs to be held accountable for driving results, and that can only happen if those results are measured (hence, another key attribute of the talent management evolution is that talent management needs to become more data-driven). And this doesn’t mean just process metrics (e.g. “over 80% of our employees have completed the training”), but more importantly, impact metrics and strategic insight (e.g. “over 80% of our employees have completed the training but quality defects have only decreased 1%; let's take another look at the root cause of those defects and see how we can beef up the training...”). Measuring business impact may not be easy, but it’s what matters. HR should be expected to quantitatively demonstrate the business impact that talent management has had on business results.

3. Ensure that talent strategy aligns with business strategy, and talent management programs support strategic priorities and deliver business value

Many organizations have traditionally taken a very transactional approach to talent management. In other words, talent management has often been focused primarily on processes and activities. For example, HR departments would focus on ensuring there is a process for recruiting, another process for performance management, for promotions, etc., and that all of these processes were working efficiently. Not that efficient and effective processes aren’t important, but they shouldn’t be a starting point. Talent management needs to start with understanding the business strategy, which then informs the talent strategy, which then translates into processes and activities to support the strategy.

Start by defining the strategic goals and priorities of the organization, and build the roadmap for how to get there. This will help determine numerous strategic talent decisions, such as:
  • How will the size of our workforce need to change? How quickly?
  • What skills will we need? Can existing employees be retrained? Do we need to hire new employees with these skills?
  • What types of leaders do we need in the next 3, 5, 10+ years? Do we have enough high potential leadership candidates internally? Do we need to look outside for leadership candidates?
  • How will strategic changes affect our employees? What do we need to do to optimize employee engagement as we implement changes?
  • How is our culture helping us get there? Is it helping us more where it’s stronger/less where it’s weaker? How? Why? What can we do about that? Who's going to be best at helping us do it?
  • What are the most important talent-related priorities? How should we prioritize effort and investment in talent management programs?

Once these strategic talent decisions are made, then it’s time to get tactical and work out what talent-related processes, programs and activities are needed to support the talent strategy. By starting with business strategy, it becomes much clearer what talent management actions are needed to support strategic priorities and deliver business value.

An example of integrated talent management

So…what does truly integrated talent management look like in practice? Great examples are still relatively hard to find, but there are a few, and General Electric (GE) is one of them. GE has been recognized as a talent management leader since the 1990s, going back to when Jack Welch put Bill Conaty into the CHRO role because of Conaty’s demonstrated performance across a number of organizational roles and his strong business acumen. Conaty was known as being an influential strategic advisor to Welch, which was even rarer among CHROs in those days.

Jack Welch saw talent as a top priority and was instrumental in driving a talent mindset across the organization. He made it unequivocally clear that talent management was the responsibility of every single leader in the organization, and they would be held accountable. He also saw developing talent as his main job: “I was a gardener providing water and other nourishment to our top 750 people. Of course, I had to pull out some weeds, too.”

Even though Welch and Conaty have both retired from GE, their legacy lives on, and GE continues to be recognized as a talent management leader. Talent management is seen as a key responsibility of all of GE’s leaders, and talent management programs are very closely aligned to business strategy. According to Jeff Immelt, GE’s current CEO, their talent management system is the most powerful tool they have to implement corporate strategy, through attracting, recruiting, developing and deploying the right people.


Here are a few examples of how GE is demonstrating integrated talent management across the organization:
  • Jeff Immelt and most of GE’s leaders spend at least 30% of their time on people-related issues.
  • Every manager at GE is responsible for the leadership development of his or her team, and they are expected to put a significant amount of effort into the leadership development processes.
  • GE identified a strategic goal of increasing the focus on technological and innovation. In response, technology skills were added as a key development requirement as part of Session C, GE’s leadership review process.
  • 21 Millennial employees were selected from across the organization for a special three-month assignment, to make recommendations to Jeff Immelt on how GE can better retain and inspire Millennials. GE implemented several of the recommendations made by the task force.

Photo credit: Pixabay
3 Comments

The evolution of talent management: where it has come from and where it needs to go

5/20/2015

4 Comments

 
Picture
These are exciting times for talent management. First, talent is finally getting the focus it deserves in the C-suite. Once treated as something for only HR departments to worry about, talent is now the number one concern of CEOs. Second, we are seeing dramatic shifts in the way companies are thinking about and approaching talent management. Employees’ priorities have changed, and talent management is changing as a result. Traditional approaches to talent management are quickly becoming obsolete, and companies that refuse to change with the times are going to find it increasingly difficult to hire and retain great people, as the economy continues to rebound and the balance of power continues to shift from employer to employee. In order to thrive, companies need to embrace a new model of talent management.

Employees' priorities have changed
The way people work has changed: how people work, when people work, where people work, and even why people work.
Picture
And it’s not just the way people work that has changed; what matters most to employees has changed significantly in recent years. A lot of research has been done on what employees want, including surveys by Ernst & Young (EY), the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM), Quantum Workplace and Gallup. It’s not a one-size-fits-all model, but several clear themes have emerged:
  • Respect: Plain and simple, employees want to be treated with respect at work. Respect topped the list of SHRM’s survey, with 72% of employees ranking "respectful treatment of all employees at all levels" as the most important factor in job satisfaction. Hence, a word of caution to command-and-control organizations: the days of leaders who steamroll their teams to get things done are numbered.
  • Flexibility: Employees’ desire for greater flexibility at work is the primary driver behind the changes in how, where and when employees work. According to an EY survey of 9,700 employees across eight countries, employees rated “being able to work flexibly and still be on track for promotion” and “working with colleagues, including my boss, who support my efforts to work flexibly” as very important in a job. And it’s not just about convenience; employees want to have the freedom to do their best work…however, wherever and whenever that may be.
  • Purpose: All employees want to do meaningful work, but purpose – the belief and understanding that you’re part of a larger force for good – is especially important to Millennials. According to the Deloitte Millennial Survey 2015, a “sense of purpose” is given as a reason for choosing to work for their current employer by six out of ten Millennials.  And what matters to Millennials, who now make up 45% of the workforce, needs to matter to employers.
  • Relationships: With employees spending so much of their waking lives focused on their job, it makes sense that they place a high value on having good relationships with their colleagues. One of Gallup’s 12 indicators of employee engagement is having a best friend at work. And according to Officevibe, 70% of employees say friends at work is the most crucial element to a happy working life. Clearly, relationships at work matter.
  • Growth opportunities: According to Quantum Workplace’s 2015 Employee Engagement Trends, professional growth and career development opportunities are one of the top drivers of employee engagement. Employees, especially high performing employees, want to have ample opportunities to continuously grow their capabilities.

How talent management is changing as a result
So, what do these changes mean for the future of talent management? In short, a lot. To continue to be successful at attracting and retaining great people, many companies will need to make a fundamental mindset shift in their approach to managing talent. Talent management needs to evolve to put people first and take its place at the center of a successful enterprise.

                                    What does the future of talent management look like?
Picture
In future blog posts, I'll do a deeper dive into each of these attributes of talent management: what the future looks like, the benefits of taking this approach to talent management, examples of companies who are successfully demonstrating these attributes and what other companies can do to get there.

Why aren't more companies embracing the future of talent management?
Change is hard, and there will always be people who are resistant to change (and therefore organizations that are resistant to change), even when the benefits of change are clear. We will continue to see more and more companies embrace the future of talent management, but such a substantial change as this will take time. Luckily, there are already a handful of companies who are leading the charge, showing us that there’s a better way to manage talent and giving us good examples to follow. One such company is Google, and Laszlo Bock does a wonderful job of sharing Google's approach to talent management in his book Work Rules! (which I highly, highly recommend to anyone interested in this topic).

I would love to hear your thoughts on the future of talent management. What other attributes would you add to the list? What do you think is driving these changes? Do you know of companies who are already living the future?

Photo credit: Wikimedia
4 Comments

Want to really reward your employees?  Build a culture of gratitude

4/26/2015

2 Comments

 
Picture
“The deepest craving of human nature is the need to be appreciated.” –William James

It is well-researched and documented that rewards and recognition are important drivers of employee engagement. And while I know this to be true, I find it hard to get excited about most company recognition programs. For example, many companies have monthly or quarterly award programs, where managers nominate employees for an award based on outstanding performance, a small committee selects a winner from the nominations they receive, and the winner is given a plaque or a certificate at the next company meeting – and if they’re lucky, perhaps a monetary award as well. I know it’s important to reward and recognize employees, but traditional approaches like this feel like a very small drop in a very big bucket. It’s a nice thought, but at the end of the day, how much engagement does it really drive to reward and recognize a few people, every once in a while?

What if there was a better way? What if companies could use rewards and recognition to make all employees feel more appreciated, more valued, more engaged, on a regular basis, all without spending a dime? There is, and they can…and it all starts with two words: Thank You.

Unleash the power of Thank You

Everyone knows that saying “thank you” is a good thing: it makes you feel happier, it makes others more willing to help you, and it fosters good relationships. Most people say thank you regularly to the people in their lives outside of work, but strangely, saying thank you at work is much less common. According to a survey by the John Templeton Foundation, people are less likely to express gratitude in the workplace than in any other area of their lives. For some reason, the typical mindset in the workplace is that an employee’s paycheck is his reward for doing good work, and additional rewards should only be given once in a while, for truly outstanding performance.

Yet this mindset makes no sense. Yes, employees expect to be paid for doing their job, but they want much more than just a paycheck. Employees want to know that their work is appreciated and valued, that they are making a meaningful difference. Saying thank you to someone is a powerful intrinsic motivator, it takes very little effort, and it doesn’t cost anything. Why would companies not want to reap the benefits of gratitude?

And those benefits have been well proven through research. In one set of experiments by Adam Grant and Francesca Gino, their research showed that employees “experience stronger feelings of self-efficacy and social worth” as a result of being thanked for their efforts. It just makes sense: if people feel appreciated at work, they will feel better about themselves and more motivated to do their best.

In fact, gratitude benefits not only those being thanked; it benefits those doing the thanking to an even greater degree. For example, being grateful has been shown to reduce stress levels and health issues like neck and back pain. Other proven benefits of being grateful include reduced levels of depression and aggression, increased happiness, increased self-esteem and increased resilience to overcoming trauma.

Building a culture of gratitude

So, with so many benefits and negligible cost, what can companies do to build a culture of gratitude? Start by setting a good example at the top, and find creative ways to encourage employees to thank each other.

Leaders need to set the example.
Like any cultural change, building a culture of gratitude needs to start with a company’s leaders. They need to demonstrate gratitude by saying thank you – frequently, consistently and sincerely. They shouldn’t just thank other leaders; in fact their thanks will likely have the most positive impact on more junior employees. It won’t happen overnight, but if all leaders say thank you on a regular basis, eventually employees will not only notice the change, they will start to emulate the example set by their leaders and say thank you to each other.

It is extremely important for leaders to be sincere when saying thank you. If they are only doing it out of a sense of obligation, employees will likely notice the hollowness of the gesture. Leaders should strive to be mindful of everyone’s contributions and sincerely thank people for making a difference. This can mean thanking employees for significant accomplishments like completing a project, but it can just as easily mean thanking employees for smaller contributions, like helping to plan a company social event, submitting a weekly report on time or brewing a new pot of coffee in the office kitchen. Even if something is a part someone’s job, it doesn’t mean she shouldn’t be thanked for doing it.

If leaders aren’t used to saying thank you at work, it’s not realistic that they will suddenly start giving sincere thanks all the time. To help leaders adopt a practice of gratitude, encourage them to spend a few minutes every day, making a list of things they are grateful for, including things in the workplace. This will help them adopt an attitude of gratitude and give them ideas for when to say thank you at work. Over time, saying thank you at work will come more easily and naturally.

Encourage employees to thank each other. In addition to leaders setting a good examples by saying thank you, there are lots of creative ways that companies can remind and encourage employees to say thank you. Here are a few ideas:
  • Have a “Thanks” award program where anyone can send a “Thanks” award to anyone else in the company. The note of thanks is sent to the employee and the manager is CC’ed. Optionally, “Thanks” award recipients can be given a small gift with their award, like a gift card or company logo merchandise (in that case, it probably makes sense to put a cap on the number of gifts an employee can receive each year, so people don’t abuse the program).
  • Have a “Thanks” wall: a display wall in the office where people can put up post-it notes to say thank you to anyone in the company. This is a great visual reminder of the importance of gratitude in the workplace. Employees should be encouraged to use the post-it notes as a supplement to saying thank you to someone directly, not as a replacement for it.
  • Make it a regular part of company meeting agendas. For example, weekly staff meetings can include a “Thanks” agenda item where leaders spend a few minutes thanking employees for something they did in the past week. They can also invite others in the meeting to contribute by saying thank you to a colleague.

Culture of gratitude vs. formal reward programs

Of course, formal reward and recognition programs are great, and I’m certainly not suggesting that companies replace them with a culture of gratitude. Formal rewards can be an important supplement to a culture of gratitude. In fact, having a culture of gratitude may make formal rewards and recognition even more valuable, because employees will know that they are not just a symbolic token but a sincere expression of appreciation.

What are your thoughts on gratitude in the workplace? Does your company have a culture of gratitude? What else can companies do to build a culture of gratitude?

Photo credit: Wikimedia

2 Comments

How to Build a Culture of Continuous Feedback

4/8/2015

7 Comments

 
Picture
“Feedback is the breakfast of champions.” –Ken Blanchard

In my early days of consulting, I remember being on a project that I didn’t like very much: it was very political, the hours were insane, much of the team was demoralized, and I had very little idea what was going on with the project overall, only a narrow view of what I was working on.  Not surprisingly, I didn’t do my best work on this project, and I got a pretty abysmal performance rating at the end of the project.  But, that negative performance rating still came as a surprise to me…because all throughout the project, I never received any feedback.  Deep down, I knew I wasn’t doing great work, but in my naiveté at the time, I assumed that because my team leader wasn’t saying anything to me about my performance, I must be doing fine.  When I read my written performance evaluation, a month or so after the project had ended, I remember feeling a sense of betrayal, thinking, “Why didn’t she ever say anything?”

As I later came to learn, this was not an unusual experience.  In fact, as a project-based consultant, I at least received feedback at the end of each project.  Many people have to wait for their annual performance review to get any kind of feedback on how they’re performing, and the “feedback” may entail nothing more than a few generic-sounding statements, such as one I heard recently: “doesn’t deal well with ambiguity.”  What does that even mean?  What is someone supposed to do with that?

When I became a team leader, one of the goals I set for myself was not to let any of the people on my teams suffer that same fate of not knowing how they’re doing until after the project had ended, and it was too late to do anything about it.  I made a point of giving regular feedback to everyone on my team.  I made a lot of mistakes, and there were many times when I got busy and didn’t give feedback as often as I should.  That said, after several years of giving feedback to – and receiving feedback from – my team members, I’ve learned a number of lessons about the best ways to give and get feedback.

Lesson #1: Give frequent, real-time feedback
This one is a no-brainer: by praising people for doing things well, right after they do them, you’re giving them a powerful reinforcement to continue those positive behaviors.  And similarly, when people don’t do so well, by talking with them soon afterwards about what went wrong and what they could have done differently, you’re giving them the best chance to course-correct by changing those behaviors.

But even though it’s so obvious, it so often doesn’t happen; people get busy and forget to give feedback, or they are uncomfortable having feedback conversations, so they put it off.  They may not realize what a missed opportunity this is for coaching and development.  Before long, they fall into the habit of not giving feedback, until weeks or months later, as part of a formal evaluation process.  By then, the opportunity to learn and grow based on the feedback has been all but lost.  Don’t make that mistake; get in the habit of giving frequent feedback to your team members, as close to real-time as possible.  As a rule of thumb, I try to give feedback to each of my team members at least 2-3 times a week, and I try to give feedback within 24 hours, sooner if possible.

Lesson #2: Give positive feedback frequently and (sometimes) publicly
A lot of people think of feedback as having a negative connotation, implying that the only time to give someone feedback is when they have done something wrong.  Perhaps because of this negative connotation, a lot of people refer to coaching instead of feedback.  To me, coaching and feedback are related but separate things (see Lesson #4 for more on coaching).  Feedback simply means “a reaction or response to a particular process or activity;” it can be positive, negative or neutral. 

Ideally, the majority of feedback given should be positive feedback.  As a rule of thumb, some people suggest that you aim to give positive feedback three times as often as you give negative feedback.  It’s very important for people to know when they have done something well, as this not only reinforces the positive behavior, but even more importantly, it sends a message that you noticed and appreciate the good work they are doing.  When employees are appreciated for their work, they tend to feel more engaged.  By regularly praising your team members when they do something well, it’s a win-win situation.

While it’s not necessary to make a point of giving all positive feedback publicly, I find that for most people, being publicly praised for good work at least some of the time is especially motivating.  Look for opportunities to publicly thank team members for their good work, such as bringing it up during a team meeting, giving them credit for their good work during a client presentation, or mentioning it in a company email.

Lesson #3: Give negative feedback privately and tactfully
Equally as important as giving people positive feedback when they do something well, giving negative feedback when people screw up, along with suggestions for improvement, is critical for helping people improve their performance.  A lot of team leaders and managers find it extremely difficult and uncomfortable to give negative feedback; unfortunately, too many of them opt to take the easy way out and avoid giving negative feedback (or they give it much later, in the form of writing, instead of face-to-face, near real-time feedback).  The team member suffers because he may not realize he did anything wrong, or even if he does, he may not know what to do about it.  He loses out on an important opportunity to learn and grow from his mistakes.  And the team as a whole often suffers if the team member’s bad performance continues, bringing down the overall performance of the team.  It can also send a message to other team members that bad performance is tolerated.

To avoid this situation, give negative feedback when a team member performs poorly, as this creates an opportunity for him to improve his performance.  As soon as possible, find time to speak privately with your team member.  Of course it’s important to be tactful in giving negative feedback, but be careful not to water it down too much or bury it in between positive feedback, to the point that the message gets lost.  I know a lot of people recommend starting and ending with positive feedback, with the negative feedback “sandwiched” in the middle, but I find this creates a risk that the only thing the team member takes away from the conversation is the positive feedback, and the main message gets lost.  By giving regular positive feedback when your team member performs well, you can cut right to the chase when it’s time to give negative feedback.  Your team member will still feel appreciated for the good work he has done, but he will also get the important message: he messed up, and you want to talk with him about what he could have done differently, to avoid making a similar mistake next time.

Lesson #4: Supplement feedback with coaching
To help your team members grow and develop from the feedback you give them, you need to supplement the feedback with coaching.  Good coaching is a two-way discussion, where you ask your team member what he could have done differently, as well as offering your own suggestions if you think it’s helpful. 

When giving positive feedback, tell your team member what he did well, and then supplement that with coaching on how he can take his already-strong performance to the next level.  For example, if your team member did a great job leading a client interview, perhaps you could talk with him about creating an opportunity for him to deliver part of the next client presentation. 

When giving negative feedback, tell your team member what you think didn’t go well, and then supplement that with coaching on what he could have done differently, and/or what he should plan to do differently next time.  For example, if your team member does a poor job leading a client interview, talk through specific examples of what didn’t go well (e.g. you spoke too quickly which made you sound nervous, you forgot to cover some of the questions), ask him what he might do differently next time, and offer suggestions for leading future interviews.  You could also help him practice with a mock interview scenario where you play the role of the client.

Regular coaching is such a critical part of employee development that you shouldn’t limit coaching to your feedback moments; you should provide regular, goal-oriented coaching to all of your team members.  But coaching is a topic for another blog post, so I’ll leave it at that.

Lesson #5: Keep written notes of feedback to use for formal reviews
I find it helpful to keep an ongoing set of notes on each of the team members I work with, and whenever I give someone feedback, I make a written note of it.  By the time we get to the end of a project, and I’m doing written performance evaluations for each of my team members, I simply reference my notes file and include many of the feedback examples in each person’s written evaluation.  When the employees receive the written evaluation, it’s simply a summary of the feedback they’ve heard directly from me over the course of the project.  There should never be any surprises in the written evaluation.

Lesson #6: Ask for feedback on your performance
Feedback should ideally be a two-way street.  In addition to giving regular feedback to my team members, I regularly ask them to give me feedback on my performance.  One of the best ways to grow and develop as a team leader is to get regular feedback – both positive and negative – on your performance.  Admittedly, getting feedback is easier said than done.  When I ask team members for feedback, I often get no feedback, or something along the lines of, “you’re doing a great job.”

Understandably, team members may be reluctant to give feedback to someone who is in a position to evaluate their performance.  I find that over time, as I build up strong, trusting relationships with my team members, and I ask for feedback as part of a casual conversation, many of them are eventually willing to give me honest feedback, both positive and negative.  But if they are not, instead of pushing too hard, I will come back to them at the end of the project, after my written evaluation has been submitted, and ask them for feedback on my performance at that point.  It’s not ideal, but it’s still better than no feedback.

Another option to consider is using a survey tool to collect anonymous feedback from your team members.  Though depending on team size, it can be hard to make it truly anonymous (and your team members know that), and it’s not as helpful as real-time, face-to-face feedback.  If you make a habit of giving your team members continuous feedback, over time, you will likely find that they will be more willing to return the favor by giving feedback to you.

Lesson #7: Help build a culture of continuous feedback by encouraging everyone to give and ask for feedback
Ideally, companies should strive to build a culture of continuous feedback, where it’s common practice for everyone to regularly give and ask for feedback.  When it’s part of the culture, people are more comfortable giving and soliciting feedback, and it becomes part of their ingrained working habits.

Like any culture change, this requires the full support of the company’s top leaders.  They need to communicate the importance of continuous feedback, not only by frequently telling their employees, but also by demonstrating it through their own actions.  If continuous feedback isn’t a part of your company’s culture, I recommend working with your company’s top leaders to get their full support in building this into the culture.

Share your feedback on feedback
Do you agree with the lessons I’ve shared?  What are your thoughts and suggestions on the best ways to give feedback?  What about suggestions on getting feedback on your own performance?  Does your company have a culture of continuous feedback?  I’d love to get your feedback!

Photo credit: CanStockPhoto

7 Comments

Improving Employee Engagement through Effective Team Leadership

3/31/2015

8 Comments

 
Picture
“Before you are a leader, success is all about growing yourself. When you become a leader, success is all about growing others.” —Jack Welch

Have you ever had the experience of working on a team with a really bad team leader?  I certainly have, and I’ve heard many depressing “bad team leader” stories from others.  I’ll share a story I heard from a young consultant – I’ll call her Sheri – who was part of a large project team with a particularly ineffective team leader.  There were about a dozen people on the team and everyone worked remotely.  Other than weekly team calls, Sheri never heard from her team leader.  She was given a very vague assignment and was not given any opportunity to ask questions.  Sheri tried sending instant messages and emails to her team leader to ask questions, but he never once responded.  Sheri would submit work products like financial models and PowerPoint slides, but the team leader gave her very little information on what he thought of her work or how it was incorporated into the overall project deliverables.  Sheri never had the opportunity to meet or speak with the client, and the team leader didn’t share any feedback from the client on what they thought of the work.  Of course, Sheri never received any feedback from the team leader on her performance during the project.  The only “feedback” she got was a mediocre performance assessment score two months after the project had ended, with no explanation given as to the reason for the mediocre score.  At the time I spoke with Sheri, she and several others on the team were already well into the process of looking for another job…and who could blame them? 

In today’s work environment, more and more work is being done collaboratively in teams.  And many of the factors that drive employee engagement are significantly influenced by team leaders.  Employees want meaningful work.  They want flexibility in how, when and where they work.  They want to have fun at work.  And they want to work with people who will help them grow their skills and inspire them to do great work.

As a result, team leaders play a critical role in employee engagement.  Since they have regular interaction with the people on their team, team leaders are often in the best position to develop employees’ skills, provide real-time performance feedback, coach employees to improve their performance, challenge employees to take on “stretch” assignments, and mentor employees on their career goals.  Team leaders are also often in the best position to sense when employees are not engaged and may be at risk of leaving their job.

Companies need to do more to support team leaders
Given the high degree of influence team leaders have on employee engagement, companies should do everything they can to help employees be great team leaders, yet this is too infrequently the case.  Often, companies provide little training and support to team leaders on how to be effective in their role.  I have heard many stories about – and experienced firsthand – situations where inexperienced team leaders have been thrown into the deep end with little or no support, and it’s up to them to “sink or swim.”  Unfortunately, in many of these situations, the team leaders clearly “sank,” which had a detrimental impact on the rest of the team.  And the problem isn’t limited to new team leaders.  In many cases, team leaders may be very good at some aspects of their role, such as keeping the client happy, but they are particularly ineffective at managing the people on their team.  Yet this goes unchecked because their performance isn’t measured on how effectively they engage the people on their team.

Sheri’s story was clearly a worst-case scenario, but based on the stories I’ve heard over the years, I suspect it’s not all that uncommon.  And even more common is the scenario of the “so-so” team leader, who provides some guidance and feedback for team members, and may genuinely want to effectively engage the team, but hasn’t been given the training or support on how to do that.  With the job market heating up these days and employees having other options available to them, even having a “so-so” team leader may be enough to convince employees to look at what else is out there.

So…what can companies do to ensure that team leaders are effectively engaging employees?  In short, companies need to do three things:
  1. Provide training and resources to team leaders
  2. Provide team leader coaching
  3. Hold team leaders accountable for employee engagement

Provide training and resources to team leaders
Formal training on team leadership can dramatically improve the effectiveness of team leaders.  At least some training should be live (in person or by webinar / teleconference), so that team leaders have the chance to ask questions, as opposed to online self-paced training.  One option might be a multi-day team leadership “boot camp” for new team leaders, supplemented with ongoing monthly presentations for all team leaders.  In addition to training, companies should provide templates, information and examples that team leaders can leverage over the lifecycle of a project, such as team building exercises, project plan templates and suggestions on coaching and feedback. 

Of course, people management is just one aspect of team leadership, and training and resources should cover a comprehensive list of topics, such as:
  • People management: team building, providing coaching and feedback, dealing with underperforming team members, assessing team member performance
  • Client management: stakeholder management, executive presence, presentation skills
  • Project / financial management: project contracting, project planning, metrics tracking, budget tracking, revenue generation
  • Thought leadership: best practice methodologies, harvesting intellectual capital

Provide team leader coaching
While training and resources are very important, they are not enough.  An equally important type of support for team leaders is coaching, especially for new team leaders.  A new team leader is inevitably going to encounter several unfamiliar challenges and may not know how to handle them.  Having an experienced team leader as a coach to go to for advice will help team leaders navigate these challenges.  How long a new team leaders gets coaching depends a lot on the person, but I would recommend a minimum of one year.  More experienced team leaders should take on the role of the coach to newer team leaders. 

When I was learning how to be an effective team leader, I had a coach that I met with biweekly, and sometimes on an ad hoc basis when I needed immediate advice on how to handle a challenging situation, such as a difficult client or an underperforming team member.  It was reassuring to know that my coach was available to help me whenever I needed it.  In addition to giving me advice on handling sticky situations, he coached me on team leadership skills, such as leading a team kickoff meeting, building out a good project plan and preparing for a client presentation, where he played the role of the client and threw curve balls at me like cutting me off with challenging questions.

Incidentally, companies should also provide training and support to the coaches on how to be an effective coach, because the quality of the coaching that team leaders receive makes a big difference.  It’s important that coaches understand what’s expected of them, and if they aren’t going to be 100% committed to the coaching role, they shouldn’t be coaches.  Coaches should also be given coaching resources, such as suggested topics to cover with the team leaders they are coaching.

Hold team leaders accountable for employee engagement
In addition to supporting team leaders through training and coaching, it’s critical to hold them accountable for their performance.  Of course, team leader performance should be measured across all of the dimensions listed above.  The problem is that team leaders are often not measured on their people management performance, the dimension that most directly drives employee engagement.  Team leader performance is often assessed by a supervisor who may not have much visibility into how effectively a team leader managed the people on the team.  As a result, team leaders may put less focus on the people management aspect of their role.

The best way to assess a team leader on people management performance is to ask the team members for input.  For example, did the team leader provide adequate direction and guidance to team members?  Did the team leader motivate team members to perform at their best?  Did the team leader provide helpful coaching and feedback to team members?  This type of input from team members can be gathered through 360 feedback or employee satisfaction surveys.  There are dozens of software products that companies can use to easily collect 360 feedback.

Unfortunately, not every team leader has the passion or talent for people management.  Someone might be a strong team leader across other dimensions but may not have the skills or the desire to lead and manage the people on her team effectively, despite training and coaching.  Sometimes in this situation, someone else on the team with strong people management skills may naturally step up to fill the role of people manager.  In other instances, where this doesn’t happen organically, it may make sense to assign someone as a “deputy team leader” who has the skills and the passion for leading the other team members.  The team leader responsibilities can be split, and performance metrics adjusted accordingly, with the team leader focusing more on client management / thought leadership and the deputy team leader focusing more on people management.  Of course, this requires a strong working relationship and frequent communication between the team leader and deputy team leader.  And it may not work well in all situations, depending on the personality of the team leader and the culture of the company.

I believe effective team leadership is critical to employee engagement…what do you think?
There are many different factors that determine how engaged an employee is, but a really effective team leader can play a major role in improving employee engagement.  Likewise, a particularly ineffective team leader can significantly decrease employee engagement.  Companies need to recognize the importance of the team leader role and give team leaders the support and the incentive to effectively lead, motivate and coach their team members.

I’d love to hear your feedback…do you agree?  Do companies do enough to support and incent team leaders to effectively manage their teams?  Do you have additional suggestions on how companies can ensure that team leaders effectively engage the employees on their teams?

Photo credit: CanStockPhoto
8 Comments

The Life-changing Magic of Mentoring

3/17/2015

8 Comments

 
Picture
“A mentor is someone who allows you to see hope inside yourself.” –Oprah Winfrey

We hear so much about mentoring and how wonderful it is…the importance of mentoring, how mentors help you move into leadership roles, everyone should have multiple mentors, etc.  But life-changing?  Yes.  A good mentor can, quite literally, change the course of your life.  A mentor might encourage you to explore career options you might not have otherwise considered.  A mentor might introduce you to someone who ends up being your next boss.  A mentor might even help you find the courage to make a significant life change.

Life Change #1: Leaving Engineering
Mentoring changed the course of my life on three occasions.  The first time, I was in my mid-twenties, feeling less than inspired by my job as a structural engineer.  I had been in engineering for over seven years, and I was restless.  Projects felt too similar to each other, like slightly different applications of the same formulas and methodologies, not radically new and challenging problems to solve.  The prospect of doing roughly the same thing over and over again for the next 40 years was, quite frankly, depressing.  But, structural engineering was what I had signed up for, what I had worked so hard to succeed at. 

My friend Marci was also a structural engineer, a few years older than me, but decades ahead of me in life wisdom.  Marci and I cycled fifteen miles together every Tuesday morning, and we had plenty of time to chat about life during our rides.  Through these chats, Marci became a very influential mentor to me.  She asked me one day, “If you’re not happy with your job, why don’t you just quit?  Take some time off and think about what you really want.”  This was one of the most ridiculous suggestions I’d ever heard.  “I can’t do that!” I scoffed.  “Why not?” she asked.  Well…hmmm…why not?  I came up with lots of reasons…people would think I couldn’t cut it, this type of thing just wasn’t done by successful people, I’d have to really cut back on my spending…but each excuse sounded shallow as I said it.  When I really thought about it, there was no good reason why I couldn’t quit my job. 

So, after talking it through with my husband, that’s exactly what I did.  My plan was to take six months off and then return to engineering, but I never returned.  Once I had time to think about what I wanted in life…my passion for business and for managing people…I decided to go to business school.

Life Change #2: Getting a Job at IBM
My second life-changing mentoring experience happened during business school.  Over the course of exploring career options, I became fascinated with management consulting.  Getting paid to solve really interesting, challenging, varied problems sounded like my dream job.  I became close with one of my professors, Batia, and I asked her for advice on changing my career to consulting.  She knew a lot about the consulting industry and gave me heaps of good advice on the different consulting companies to consider, and which ones might suit me the best based on my background and personality.  She also gave me great advice on my resume, cover letters and interviewing tips, which was extremely helpful since structural engineering was a very atypical background for a management consultant.  I couldn’t believe how generous Batia was with her time…and she didn’t stop there.  She also introduced me to people she knew at several consulting companies.  One of those companies was IBM. 

Batia introduced me to one of her former students, Felicia, who was now working in IBM’s internal strategy consulting group.  By the time I got to first round interviews with IBM, I had already spoken with two people in the internal consulting group, and those connections helped me to sail through first rounds.  I got to final rounds, and it turned out that one of my interviewers was Felicia.  Maybe I was feeling too self-assured going into the interview, or maybe I hadn’t had enough sleep, or maybe it was just bad luck…but I bombed my case interview with Felicia.  I knew that was probably the end of the road for me with IBM.  But Felicia called me that evening.  “This is an unusual call, because we’re not saying yes and we’re not saying no.  You bombed your case, but Batia wrote such a strong letter of recommendation for you that we’ve decided to give you another chance.  Practice your casing this weekend, and we’ll have you back for another set of interviews next week.”  Wow, how often in life do you get a do-over like that?  I practiced hard that weekend, I nailed the case interview the following week, IBM gave me the offer, and I spent 8 ½ years working in IBM’s internal consulting group.  Thanks to my amazing mentor, Batia.

Life Change #3: Following My Passion for People
My third life-changing mentoring experience happened just a few months ago.  I was still working in IBM’s internal consulting group at the time, and I still loved my job, but part of me was feeling like it was time to think about finding the next thing.  I had become increasingly passionate about talent management over the past few years, and I was feeling more and more like I wanted to move my career in that direction.  In fact, I had been feeling that way for quite some time, but I was happy enough with my job that I wasn’t proactive about pursuing talent management opportunities.  Then about six months ago, I decided to reach out to one of my mentors, Christina Zini. 

I had known Christina for several years, since we worked together on a project at IBM, and she had become an important mentor to me as well as a friend.  Christina had left IBM to start her own business as a women’s leadership coach (shedreamsbig.com).  Feeling like it was time to be more proactive about shaping my career, I hired Christina as my career coach.  Through our biweekly coaching calls, I became more focused on thinking about where I wanted to take my career, and what actions I should take to get there.  With Christina’s help, I developed a plan to start building my brand as a talent expert and to start exploring talent-related career opportunities. 

Then, my career-change plan suddenly accelerated when I was put on a project that I particularly disliked.  I decided that rather than spending the next several months focused on something I wasn’t passionate about, I would quit my job and focus all my efforts on following my passion and finding a job in the talent space.  So that’s exactly what I did. 

I am now a few months into my job search, and while some people may think I’m crazy for walking away from a perfectly good job with a steady paycheck, I know I did the right thing.  And it was working with Christina that not only helped me figure out a career plan, but gave me the confidence to take a bold risk and follow my passion.

Those are my mentoring stories…and I’ve heard and read similar stories from countless others, across all stages of life, about how mentoring profoundly changed their lives.  The inner city school kid who was inspired by his “big brother” to work hard in school and apply for college.  The college graduate who was encouraged by her professor to follow her passion for social work instead of taking a job in the family business.  The young financial analyst who left his job on Wall Street for a technology startup, because his mentor not only encouraged him to follow his passion but introduced him to the entrepreneur who hired him.  The 50-year-old mother who decided to go back to school after her youngest child left home, and became a massage therapist, because of the support and encouragement of a good friend.  The list goes on and on. 

What’s your story?  How has mentoring changed your life?  Please share your story in the comments section below…I’d love to hear from you!

Photo credit: canstockphoto.com

8 Comments

    Author

    Jackie Bassett is a Director of People Strategy for UChicago Medicine, who is passionate about people...and helping organizations thrive by putting people first.

    Picture

    Archives

    January 2019
    July 2017
    August 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015

    RSS Feed

    Categories

    All
    Career
    Culture
    Employee Engagement
    Feedback
    Gratitude
    Leadership
    Mentoring
    Onboarding
    Passion
    Talent Management
    Trust

Proudly powered by Weebly